Thesis
Dominant social practices in our culture - nightmarish industrial atrocities they may be - evolved to fit this culture's demands and will not be replaced by voluntaristic feel-good tree-hugging utopian fantasies.
Major Claim: The food movement fails to change the way the majority of people eat. The failure only shows that the fast food culture is superior to the voluntaristic fantasies.
Supporting claim 1: Food movement is getting more recognition in the media
Evidence: Food Journalism: “the food journalism of the last decade has succeeded in making clear and telling connections between the methods of industrial food production, agricultural policy, food-borne illness, childhood obesity, the decline of the family meal as an institution, and, notably, the decline of family income beginning in the 1970s.”
Evidence: The movement : The Movement, which has surely done more than any other reform effort in American history to provoke popular interest in sustainable agriculture, encompasses such a hodge-podge of sub-genres—localism, organic, “deep organic,” “artisanal” production, anti-GMO, foragers, farmers’ markets, free-range meats, slow food, etc
Supporting claim 2: The way people eat is having a negative affect on our society and themselves no matter the success of the food movement..
Evidence: Obesity: “The annual cost of obesity alone is now twice as large as the fast food total revenue.”
Evidence: expansion of fast food restaurants: “The number of fast food restaurants, or QSRs, in the U.S. increased 12.8% in the past 10 years, with 138,340 outlets doing business in '02 compared with 120,633 in '92, according to a report from RoperASW”
Evidence: Convenience of fast food: (Prices for fresh produce have increased since the 1980s.)
Fast Food Nation
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/jun/10/food-movement-rising/